Dividend Stocks vs. Growth Stocks: Which Need to Be In Your Portfolio?

admin • May 24, 2023

Dividend stocks and growth stocks are often pitted against one another as an either-or option when building an investment portfolio. 

From one perspective, we hear about the importance of building a portfolio of income-producing assets, such as dividend stocks, particularly for investors nearing retirement. Dividend stocks appeal to many investors as a safe option for supplementing their portfolio with a steady and reliable income stream, which can be comforting during market turmoil and elevated economic uncertainty. 

Conversely, growth stocks are appealing and exciting because they provide a more significant return potential, though not without inherently more risk. The idea of relying on anticipated but not guaranteed growth for a return on investment is enough to make some investors run. Still, the potential for capital appreciation keeps other investors seeking promising portfolio prospects.

Dividend stocks often get the spotlight during market downturns when investors turn to safety and stability, while growth stocks steal the show during economic expansions. With that said, wouldn’t it be more beneficial for investors to embrace a both-and strategy rather than an either-or mindset while building a well-diversified portfolio?

Exploring the Characteristics and Examples of Dividend Stocks and Growth Stocks

Before making any investment decisions, you should have a solid understanding of what you’re investing in. Let’s take a moment to explore what sets dividend stocks and growth stocks apart by uncovering their unique characteristics and highlighting a few examples of each.

Dividend Stocks

Dividend stocks regularly distribute a portion of a publicly traded company’s earnings to investors in the form of cash or stock. For example, if a company pays a dividend of 10 cents per share, an investor with 1,000 shares would receive $100 in cash. On the other hand, a stock dividend is a payment to investors in the form of additional shares. In this case, if a company pays a 10% stock dividend, an investor with 1,000 shares would receive an additional 100. 

Since the tech boom of the 90s, dividend stocks generally don’t appreciate in value as quickly or steadily as growth stocks, but growth may still happen. Therefore, adding dividend stocks to your portfolio may provide both income and capital appreciation over time.

Dividend-paying companies tend to be well-known and well-established, adding another layer of comfort for investors. Moreover, investors may feel confident investing in a financially healthy company since dividends are sourced from retained earnings. Some prominent dividend payers include Johnson & Johnson, Exxon Mobil, Procter & Gamble, and The Coca-Cola Company.

It’s not surprising that dividend stocks have become a staple in many portfolios; however, focusing exclusively on dividend stocks could result in missing out on the potential wealth-building capabilities of growth stocks. 

Growth Stocks

Growth stocks are stocks of publicly traded companies that anticipate their earnings to continue growing at a rate that tops the market average. These are typically newer companies or companies in growth sectors, such as technology or pharmaceutical, with substantial and rapid growth potential. These companies usually reinvest earnings back into the company to generate more profits, which can drive up share prices, instead of paying dividends to investors.

Growth stocks tend to carry more fluctuation risk, which may be intolerable for some investors. Investors risk missing out on potential profit if they sell their stock too early or too late since profits (or losses) are only realized once the investment is sold. Still, many investors who ride out periods of volatility have experienced considerable capital appreciation in their portfolios. 

Amazon, Google, and Tesla are classic examples of growth companies that have heavily invested in product research and development to stay on top of the innovation race. Early investors in these companies have seen a sizable increase in the value of their investments, but not without fluctuation along the way.

Investing in growth stocks can be an exciting and massive wealth-building opportunity for those willing to stomach the risk. Though as attractive and compelling as growth stocks can be, it’s essential to avoid getting too absorbed by flashy growth characteristics when building your portfolio. 

Dividend vs. Growth Stocks: Which Is the Better Buy?

In our opinion, both dividend and growth stocks are essential in any portfolio. There are cycles and conditions where one may outperform the other, but both are important to improving your portfolio’s income and growth potential.

So instead of asking, “Which is the better buy?,” a more relevant question to consider is, “What is my ideal exposure to each?”

Many factors influence your allocation, and there is no one-size-fits-all approach. Let’s take a look at a couple of examples: 

  • Age: Younger investors have more time to recover from market setbacks or bad investments. Therefore, many are willing to forgo a heavily income-focused portfolio to invest in growth stocks. However, investors nearing or in retirement may prioritize capital preservation and income generation while reducing their exposure to growth stocks. 

 

  • Risk Tolerance and Capacity: While age is undoubtedly an essential factor to consider, it doesn’t automatically mean you should have more or less exposure to dividend or growth stocks. Some younger investors can’t stomach a steep decline in their portfolios and choose to invest more conservatively. In contrast, some more seasoned investors have weathered the ups and downs of the market and are comfortable taking on more risk.

 

Risk capacity is equally important to consider. For instance, a significant loss of capital may not affect the lifestyle of a higher net-worth investor, which gives them the ability to take on more risk regardless of age. 

Since every investor’s journey is unique, adopting a holistic approach is crucial to determine an appropriate allocation. Your exposure to various investments will undoubtedly shift as you enter new stages of life with unique goals for that season, but the message remains the same: both dividend stocks and growth stocks have a place in your portfolio.

Laying the Dividend Stocks vs. Growth Stocks Debate to Rest

It’s worth noting that dividend and growth stocks aren’t the only components of a well-diversified portfolio, but both are key players. They may each have their time to shine during various cycles of the economy and market, which is why it’s important to diversify across both rather than favor one over the other. 

After all, a principle of building and preserving wealth is not to concentrate solely on what seems safe or exciting but instead to diversify and get exposure to many parts of the market in such a way that is in alignment with your risk profile and goals. 

If you’re interested in discussing your financial goals and reviewing your investment strategy to determine if you’re on the right track, we’d love to get in touch. Give us a call at 877.333.1015, email us at info@fivepinewealth.com , or visit our website to learn more about how we can help.

Join Our Newsletter


Plan smarter with our monthly financial tips + insights

What High Earners Overlook After Maxing Out Their 401(k)

January 26, 2026
Key Takeaways High earners maxing out 401(k)s at $24,500 are only saving about 8% of a $300,000 income in their primary retirement account. The mega backdoor Roth strategy can increase total 401(k) contributions to $72,000 annually with tax-free growth. A comprehensive approach can create nearly $3 million in additional retirement wealth over 20 years. It's 2026. You're checking all the boxes. You're earning upwards of $300,000 annually, and you're maxing out your 401(k) every year. You've reached the $24,500 contribution limit and feel confident about securing your financial future. Then you realize $24,500 represents less than 8% of your income. Over 20 years, this gap adds up to millions in lost opportunity. Thankfully, you're not stuck with the basic 401(k) playbook. There are sophisticated strategies beyond your contribution limit. 5 Strategic Moves for High Earners with Maxed-Out 401(k)s Here are five sophisticated strategies that can help you build wealth beyond your basic 401(k) contributions. All projections assume a 7% average annual return and are estimates for illustrative purposes. 1. Mega Backdoor Roth Contributions If your employer's 401(k) plan allows after-tax contributions, this could be your biggest opportunity. With employee contributions, employer match, and after-tax contributions, the combined 401(k) limit for 2026 is $72,000 ($80,000 if you're 50 or older). The mega backdoor Roth works because you immediately convert those after-tax contributions into a Roth account, where they grow tax-free forever. The catch: Not all employers offer this option. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service Roth conversions. The impact: The available space for after-tax contributions depends on your employer match. With a typical employer match of 3-6% (roughly $10,000-$21,000 on a $350,000 salary), you could contribute approximately $26,500-$37,000 annually. At 7% average returns over 20 years, this creates approximately $1.1-$1.5 million in additional tax-free retirement savings. 2. Donor-Advised Funds for Charitable Giving If you're charitably inclined, donor-advised funds (DAFs) offer a way to bunch several years of charitable contributions into one tax year, maximizing your itemized deductions while still spreading your giving over time. You get an immediate tax deduction for the full contribution, but you can recommend grants to charities over many years. The funds grow tax-free in the meantime. The catch: Once you contribute to a DAF, the money is irrevocably committed to charity. You can't get it back for personal use. The impact: Contributing $50,000 to a DAF in a high-income year (versus giving $10,000 annually) can create immediate federal tax savings of $15,000-$18,500 while still allowing you to support the same charities over five years. 3. Taxable Brokerage Accounts with Tax-Loss Harvesting Once you've maximized tax-advantaged accounts, strategic taxable investing becomes your next move. The key is working with a financial advisor who implements systematic tax-loss harvesting throughout the year. Tax-loss harvesting involves selling investments at a loss to offset capital gains elsewhere. Done strategically, this can save thousands in taxes annually. The catch: Long-term capital gain rates (0%, 15%, or 20%) are lower than ordinary income tax rates, but you're still paying taxes on gains. It's less tax-efficient than retirement accounts, but far better than ignoring tax optimization. The impact: For high earners in the 35-37% ordinary income brackets, the difference between long-term capital gains (20%) and ordinary rates is significant. Effective tax-loss harvesting on $50,000 in annual gains over 20 years could save $150,000+ in taxes. 4. Health Savings Account (HSA) Triple Tax Advantage HSAs offer a unique triple tax benefit: tax-deductible contributions, tax-free growth, and tax-free withdrawals for qualified medical expenses. With 2026 contribution limits of $4,400 for individuals and $8,750 for families, this adds another powerful layer to your strategy. You can invest HSA funds just like an IRA and let them grow for decades. After age 65, you can withdraw the funds for any purpose, medical or otherwise. The catch: You must have a high-deductible health plan to qualify for an HSA. After age 65, non-medical withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income (like traditional IRA distributions), but you still benefit from the upfront deduction and decades of tax-free growth. The impact: Contributing the family maximum ($8,750) annually for 20 years at a 7% average annual return creates approximately $355,000-$360,000 in tax-advantaged savings. 5. Backdoor Roth IRA Contributions Not to be confused with mega backdoor Roth contributions! Even if your income exceeds the Roth IRA contribution limits, you can still fund a Roth through the backdoor method: make a non-deductible contribution to a traditional IRA, then immediately convert it to a Roth IRA. The catch: If you have existing traditional IRA balances, the pro-rata rule complicates things. You may want to consider rolling those funds into your 401(k) first if your plan allows. The impact: Contributing $7,000 annually through the backdoor Roth for 20 years at 7% average annual return creates approximately $285,000-$290,000 in tax-free retirement savings. What Compounding These Strategies Looks Like Over 20 Years Let’s look at approximate outcomes based on a 7% average annual return. 401(k) Only: Annual contribution: $24,500 Total after 20 years: ~$1M 401(k) + Mega Backdoor Roth: Annual contribution: $72,000 Total after 20 years: ~$3M Note: Mega backdoor Roth space varies based on your employer's match. These calculations assume you're maximizing the total annual limit. Comprehensive Approach (under age 50): Mega Backdoor Roth: ~$3.0M HSA: ~$350K-$360K Backdoor Roth IRA: ~$285K-$290K Strategic taxable investing with tax-loss harvesting Total retirement savings: ~$3.6M+, plus taxable investments Comprehensive Approach (ages 50-59): With higher contribution limits and catch-up contributions, total retirement savings can reach ~$4M+ over 20 years. Comprehensive Approach (ages 60–63 with enhanced catch-up contributions) Higher contribution limits during peak earning years allow for meaningful acceleration of retirement savings. The exact impact depends on timing, contribution duration, and existing balances. The Bottom Line The difference between stopping at your basic 401(k) and implementing a comprehensive strategy can approach $3 million or more in additional retirement wealth over time. Why Strategic Coordination Matters These aren't either/or decisions. The most effective approach coordinates multiple strategies while ensuring everything works together. At Five Pine Wealth Management , we help high-earning clients build comprehensive plans that go beyond the 401(k). We coordinate your employer benefits, tax strategies, and investment accounts to create a cohesive approach that maximizes your wealth-building potential. This requires working across several areas: Analyzing your employer's 401(k) plan for mega backdoor Roth opportunities Implementing systematic tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts Coordinating Roth conversions and backdoor contributions Optimizing your HSA as a long-term retirement vehicle Ensuring charitable giving strategies align with your tax situation Maximizing catch-up contributions when you reach milestone ages As fiduciary advisors, we're legally obligated to act in your best interest. That means we're focused on strategies that serve your goals, not products that generate commissions. Ready to see what's possible beyond your 401(k)? Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation about your specific situation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: Does my employer's 401(k) plan automatically allow mega backdoor Roth contributions? A: No. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service conversions to Roth. Check with your HR department. Q: How do I prioritize which investment strategies to use? A: Generally, maximize employer match first (it's free money), then fully fund your 401(k), explore Mega Backdoor Roth if available, max out your HSA, consider backdoor Roth IRA contributions, and then move to taxable accounts with tax-loss harvesting. We can help determine the right sequence for your circumstances.

The Portfolio Decisions That Matter 10 Years Before Retirement

December 22, 2025
Key Takeaways Your guaranteed income sources (pensions, Social Security) matter more than your age when deciding allocation. Retiring at 65 doesn't mean your timeline ends. You likely have 20-30 years of investing ahead. Think in time buckets: near-term stability, mid-term balance, long-term growth. You're 55 years old with over a million dollars saved for retirement. Your 401(k) statements arrive each month, and you find yourself questioning whether your current allocation still makes sense. Should you be moving everything to bonds? Keeping it all in stocks? Something in between? There's no single "correct" asset allocation for everyone in this position. What works for you depends on factors unique to your situation: your retirement income sources, spending needs, and risk tolerance. Let's look at what matters most as you approach this major life transition. Why Asset Allocation Changes as Retirement Approaches When you’re 30 or 40, your investment timeline stretches decades into the future. When you’re 55 and looking to retire at 65, that equation changes because you’re no longer just building wealth: you’re preparing to start spending it. You need enough growth to keep pace with inflation and fund decades of retirement, but you also need stability to avoid the need to sell investments during market downturns. At this point, asset allocation 10 years before retirement is more nuanced than a simple “more conservative” approach. Understanding Your Actual Time Horizon Hitting retirement age doesn't make your investment timeline shrink to zero. If you retire at 65 and live to 90, that's a 25-year investment horizon. Think about your money in buckets based on when you'll need it: Time Horizon Investment Approach Example Needs Short-Term (Years 1-5 of Retirement) Stable & accessible funds Monthly living expenses, healthcare costs, and early travel plans Medium-Term (Years 6-15) Moderate risk; balanced growth Home repairs, care and income replacement, and helping grandchildren with college Long-Term (Years 16+) Growth-oriented with a Long-term care expenses, decades-long timeline legacy planning, and extended longevity needs This bucket approach helps you think beyond simple stock-versus-bond percentages. Asset Allocation 10 Years Before Retirement: Starting Points While there's no one-size-fits-all answer, here are some reasonable starting frameworks: Conservative Approach (60% stocks / 40% bonds) : Makes sense if you have minimal guaranteed income or plan to begin drawing heavily from your portfolio upon retirement. Moderate Approach (70% stocks / 30% bonds) : Works well for those with some guaranteed income sources, moderate risk tolerance, and a flexible withdrawal strategy. Growth-Oriented Approach (80% stocks / 20% bonds) : Can be appropriate if you have substantial guaranteed income covering basic expenses and the flexibility to reduce spending temporarily as needed. Remember, these are starting points for discussion, not recommendations. 3 Steps to Evaluate Your Current Allocation Ready to see if your current allocation still makes sense? Here's how to start: Step 1: Calculate your current stock/bond split. Pull your recent statements and add up everything in stocks (including mutual funds and ETFs) versus bonds. Divide each by your total portfolio to get percentages. Step 2: List your guaranteed retirement income. Write down income sources that aren't portfolio-dependent: Social Security (estimate at ssa.gov), pensions, annuities, rental income, or planned part-time work. Total the monthly amount. Step 3: Calculate your coverage gap. Estimate monthly retirement expenses, then subtract your guaranteed income. If guaranteed income covers 70-80%+ of expenses, you can be more growth-oriented. Under 50% coverage means you'll need a more balanced approach. When to Adjust Your Allocation Here are specific triggers that signal it's time to review and potentially adjust: Your allocation has drifted more than 5% from target. If you started at 70/30 stocks to bonds and market movements have pushed you to 77/23, it's time to rebalance back to your target. Your retirement timeline changes significantly. Planning to retire at 60 instead of 65? That's a trigger. Every two years of timeline shift warrants a fresh look at your allocation. Major health changes occur. A serious diagnosis that changes your life expectancy or healthcare costs should prompt an allocation review. You gain or lose a guaranteed income source. Inheriting a pension through remarriage, losing expected Social Security benefits through divorce, or discovering your pension is underfunded. Market volatility affects your sleep. If you're checking your portfolio daily and feeling genuine anxiety about normal market movements, your allocation might be too aggressive for your comfort, and that's a valid reason to adjust. Beyond Stocks and Bonds Modern retirement planning involves more than just deciding your stock-to-bond ratio. Consider international diversification (20-30% of your stock allocation), real estate exposure through REITs, cash reserves covering 1-2 years of spending, and income-producing investments such as dividend-paying stocks. The Biggest Mistake: Becoming Too Conservative Too Soon Moving everything to bonds at 55 might feel safer, but it creates two significant problems. First, you're almost guaranteeing that inflation will outpace your returns over a 30-year retirement. Second, you're missing a decade of potential growth during your peak earning and saving years. The difference between 60% and 80% stock allocation over 10 years can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars in portfolio value. Being too conservative can be just as risky as being too aggressive, just in different ways. Questions to Ask Yourself As you think about your asset allocation for the next 10 years: What percentage of my retirement spending will be covered by Social Security, pensions, or other guaranteed income? How flexible is my retirement budget? Could I reduce spending by 10-20% during a market downturn? What's my emotional reaction to seeing my portfolio drop 20% or more? Do I plan to leave money to heirs, or is my goal to spend most of it during retirement? Your honest answers to these questions matter more than your age or any generic allocation rule. Work With Professionals Who Understand Your Complete Picture At Five Pine Wealth Management, we help clients work through these decisions by looking at their complete financial picture. We stress-test different allocation strategies against various market scenarios, coordinate withdrawal strategies with tax planning, and help clients understand the trade-offs between different approaches. If you're within 10 years of retirement and wondering whether your current allocation still makes sense, let's talk. Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: What is the rule of thumb for asset allocation by age? A: Traditional rules like "subtract your age from 100" are oversimplified. Your allocation should be based on your guaranteed income sources, spending flexibility, and risk tolerance; not just your age. Q: Should I move my 401(k) to bonds before retirement? A: Not entirely. You still need growth to outpace inflation. Gradually shift toward a balanced allocation (60-80% stocks, depending on your situation) and keep 1-2 years of expenses in stable investments. Q: What's the difference between stocks and bonds in a retirement portfolio?  A: Stocks provide growth potential to keep pace with inflation but come with volatility. Bonds offer stability and income but typically don't grow as much.