Timing the Market vs. Time in the Market: Why Patience Is Key to Building Wealth

February 28, 2025

Investing can often feel like a rollercoaster—markets climb, markets dip, and we’re all left wondering what’s next. With all the ups and downs, it can be hard not to give in to the urge to act: buy when things are up and promising, sell when things start to go down and look troubling. 


Is this really the best approach, though?


Trying to time the market versus spending time in the market is a debate every investor faces at some point. While it can be tempting to jump in and out of investments to maximize your returns, long-term investing has historically been the better option. Investing for the long term can help you build lasting wealth that stands the test of time, regardless of market fluctuations.


Timing the Market


Market timing is a financial strategy of buying and selling investments based on short-term market movements. When you try to time the market, you make decisions based on economic forecasts, news events, and market indicators in an attempt to profit from fluctuations. 


It can be easy to fall into the trap of trying to time the market. It’s hard not to panic and sell when markets start to drop (you want to avoid further losses!). On the other hand, when the market is soaring, it’s tempting to chase the stocks that have been performing well, hoping the gains will continue.


Buy when prices are low and sell when they’re high or hit their peak—it sounds like a strong investment strategy. The idea of timing the market can be appealing, as it allows you to maximize your gains and minimize your losses (in theory).

 

The reality of market timing, however, isn’t as appealing—it's incredibly difficult to do correctly and consistently. Market cycles are, by nature, unpredictable. Even seasoned analysts who make predictions based on advanced data modeling and years of experience are rarely successful at perfectly timing the market over the long run. 


While in the short term, you might get timing the market right occasionally, the odds of consistently making the right moves over the long term aren’t in your favor, and you can miss out on key opportunities to grow your wealth.


Time in the Market


Time in the market is the practice of remaining invested in the markets over the long term, regardless of short-term fluctuations or price swings. Instead of worrying about the day-to-day volatility of stocks and trying to predict highs and lows, you focus instead on letting your money grow over time. 


Long-term investing requires patience, but history shows that if you stay invested through market ups and downs, you’re more likely to come out ahead. Markets have historically trended upward over time, and the longer you stay in the market, the greater your opportunity to benefit from compounded returns, which can turn even modest investments into substantial wealth over the long term.


Compound growth is one of the most effective wealth-building tools in investing: instead of withdrawing your earnings each year, you leave them invested so they can generate returns of their own. With the compounding effect, your investment can grow exponentially and far surpass the returns you would have had if you had jumped in and out of the market.


Before we get into a practical example, let’s get this disclaimer out of the way: market returns are not guaranteed and past performance doesn’t predict future results.


Say you invest $10,000 in a fund with an average annual return of 7%. Here’s how compound growth would work over time:


Year 1: You earn 7% on $10,000, which equals $10,700. 


Year 2: You earn 7% on $10,700, which equals $11,449. 


Year 3: You earn 7% on $11,449, which equals $12,250. 


By Year 30, your investment could grow to approximately $76,123, assuming a consistent 7% annual return.


In contrast, if you had taken out your earnings every year instead of leaving them invested, after 30 years your investment would be worth $31,000. This figure includes your initial $10,000 plus $21,000 in simple interest ($700 per year for 30 years). 


The power of time in the market and staying invested over the long term allows your money to work for you, building wealth over time.


The Risks of Timing the Market


Trying to time the market can significantly impact the long-term performance of your investment portfolio in several ways and often introduces more risk than reward. 


Missing the Market’s Best Days 

Market recoveries often happen quickly and, historically, some of the stock market’s biggest gains occur within days or weeks of its steepest declines. If you exit the market during a downturn and fail to re-enter at the right time, you can potentially miss out on the crucial rebound period. 


Studies have shown that missing even just 10 of the market’s best days over a few decades can significantly reduce your overall returns. It’s not about when you invest, but how long you stay invested. 


One study found that staying fully invested over a 20-year period yielded an average annual return of 9.8%, whereas missing the 10 best days reduced the return to 5.6%. Notably, many of these best days occurred shortly after the worst days, highlighting the difficulty of timing the market effectively.


Emotional Investing Can Lead to Poor Decisions

Fear and greed are two of the most common challenges you can face as an investor. When markets decline, fear causes many investors to sell—locking in losses instead of riding out the volatility. And when markets soar, greed can drive investors to buy at inflated prices, leading to poor entry points in the market.


This cycle of emotional decision-making and trying to time the market can lead to your investments underperforming, preventing you from reaching your long-term financial goals.


You Have to Be Right Twice

Timing the market can require being right twice: even if you correctly predict when to sell before a downturn, you still have to predict when to buy back and re-enter the market. This is extremely difficult to do perfectly, every time. 


Investors who sell out of fear might wait too long to get back into the market, often missing the rebound and then buying back at a higher price. This common misstep can erase any perceived advantage or gains from market timing.


Long-Term Investing for Long-Term Success


Successful investing isn’t about avoiding downturns; it’s about staying invested long enough to benefit from the market's long-term growth. Every bear market has eventually given way to recovery, and these historical trends favor long-term investors, where patience often leads to rewards.


Market fluctuations are temporary, but your financial objectives—retirement, wealth building, and wealth preservation—are long-term. A disciplined and strategic approach allows you to weather short-term volatility while keeping your focus on achieving your goals. Instead of reacting to short-term noise, invest for long-term success.


At Five Pine Wealth Management, we’ll work with you to build a portfolio that aligns with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and objectives. Together, we’ll develop a strategy that withstands market fluctuations and positions you for steady growth and resilience over time. 


As fiduciary financial advisors, we have your best interest at the forefront of everything we do, providing personalized guidance that prioritizes your financial well-being and helps you achieve your goals with confidence. To see how we can help you invest for long-term success, email us or give us a call at: 877.333.1015.

Join Our Newsletter


Plan smarter with our monthly financial tips + insights

You've Maxed Your 401(k). Now What? A Strategic Guide for High Earners

January 26, 2026
Key Takeaways High earners maxing out 401(k)s at $24,500 are only saving about 8% of a $300,000 income in their primary retirement account. The mega backdoor Roth strategy can increase total 401(k) contributions to $72,000 annually with tax-free growth. A comprehensive approach can create nearly $3 million in additional retirement wealth over 20 years. It's 2026. You're checking all the boxes. You're earning upwards of $300,000 annually, and you're maxing out your 401(k) every year. You've reached the $24,500 contribution limit and feel confident about securing your financial future. Then you realize $24,500 represents less than 8% of your income. Over 20 years, this gap adds up to millions in lost opportunity. Thankfully, you're not stuck with the basic 401(k) playbook. There are sophisticated strategies beyond your contribution limit. 5 Strategic Moves for High Earners with Maxed-Out 401(k)s Here are five sophisticated strategies that can help you build wealth beyond your basic 401(k) contributions. All projections assume a 7% average annual return and are estimates for illustrative purposes. 1. Mega Backdoor Roth Contributions If your employer's 401(k) plan allows after-tax contributions, this could be your biggest opportunity. With employee contributions, employer match, and after-tax contributions, the combined 401(k) limit for 2026 is $72,000 ($80,000 if you're 50 or older). The mega backdoor Roth works because you immediately convert those after-tax contributions into a Roth account, where they grow tax-free forever. The catch: Not all employers offer this option. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service Roth conversions. The impact: The available space for after-tax contributions depends on your employer match. With a typical employer match of 3-6% (roughly $10,000-$21,000 on a $350,000 salary), you could contribute approximately $26,500-$37,000 annually. At 7% average returns over 20 years, this creates approximately $1.1-$1.5 million in additional tax-free retirement savings. 2. Donor-Advised Funds for Charitable Giving If you're charitably inclined, donor-advised funds (DAFs) offer a way to bunch several years of charitable contributions into one tax year, maximizing your itemized deductions while still spreading your giving over time. You get an immediate tax deduction for the full contribution, but you can recommend grants to charities over many years. The funds grow tax-free in the meantime. The catch: Once you contribute to a DAF, the money is irrevocably committed to charity. You can't get it back for personal use. The impact: Contributing $50,000 to a DAF in a high-income year (versus giving $10,000 annually) can create immediate federal tax savings of $15,000-$18,500 while still allowing you to support the same charities over five years. 3. Taxable Brokerage Accounts with Tax-Loss Harvesting Once you've maximized tax-advantaged accounts, strategic taxable investing becomes your next move. The key is working with a financial advisor who implements systematic tax-loss harvesting throughout the year. Tax-loss harvesting involves selling investments at a loss to offset capital gains elsewhere. Done strategically, this can save thousands in taxes annually. The catch: Long-term capital gain rates (0%, 15%, or 20%) are lower than ordinary income tax rates, but you're still paying taxes on gains. It's less tax-efficient than retirement accounts, but far better than ignoring tax optimization. The impact: For high earners in the 35-37% ordinary income brackets, the difference between long-term capital gains (20%) and ordinary rates is significant. Effective tax-loss harvesting on $50,000 in annual gains over 20 years could save $150,000+ in taxes. 4. Health Savings Account (HSA) Triple Tax Advantage HSAs offer a unique triple tax benefit: tax-deductible contributions, tax-free growth, and tax-free withdrawals for qualified medical expenses. With 2026 contribution limits of $4,400 for individuals and $8,750 for families, this adds another powerful layer to your strategy. You can invest HSA funds just like an IRA and let them grow for decades. After age 65, you can withdraw the funds for any purpose, medical or otherwise. The catch: You must have a high-deductible health plan to qualify for an HSA. After age 65, non-medical withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income (like traditional IRA distributions), but you still benefit from the upfront deduction and decades of tax-free growth. The impact: Contributing the family maximum ($8,750) annually for 20 years at a 7% average annual return creates approximately $355,000-$360,000 in tax-advantaged savings. 5. Backdoor Roth IRA Contributions Not to be confused with mega backdoor Roth contributions! Even if your income exceeds the Roth IRA contribution limits, you can still fund a Roth through the backdoor method: make a non-deductible contribution to a traditional IRA, then immediately convert it to a Roth IRA. The catch: If you have existing traditional IRA balances, the pro-rata rule complicates things. You may want to consider rolling those funds into your 401(k) first if your plan allows. The impact: Contributing $7,000 annually through the backdoor Roth for 20 years at 7% average annual return creates approximately $285,000-$290,000 in tax-free retirement savings. What Compounding These Strategies Looks Like Over 20 Years Let’s look at approximate outcomes based on a 7% average annual return. 401(k) Only: Annual contribution: $24,500 Total after 20 years: ~$1M 401(k) + Mega Backdoor Roth: Annual contribution: $72,000 Total after 20 years: ~$3M Note: Mega backdoor Roth space varies based on your employer's match. These calculations assume you're maximizing the total annual limit. Comprehensive Approach (under age 50): Mega Backdoor Roth: ~$3.0M HSA: ~$350K-$360K Backdoor Roth IRA: ~$285K-$290K Strategic taxable investing with tax-loss harvesting Total retirement savings: ~$3.6M+, plus taxable investments Comprehensive Approach (ages 50-59): With higher contribution limits and catch-up contributions, total retirement savings can reach ~$4M+ over 20 years. Comprehensive Approach (ages 60–63 with enhanced catch-up contributions) Higher contribution limits during peak earning years allow for meaningful acceleration of retirement savings. The exact impact depends on timing, contribution duration, and existing balances. The Bottom Line The difference between stopping at your basic 401(k) and implementing a comprehensive strategy can approach $3 million or more in additional retirement wealth over time. Why Strategic Coordination Matters These aren't either/or decisions. The most effective approach coordinates multiple strategies while ensuring everything works together. At Five Pine Wealth Management , we help high-earning clients build comprehensive plans that go beyond the 401(k). We coordinate your employer benefits, tax strategies, and investment accounts to create a cohesive approach that maximizes your wealth-building potential. This requires working across several areas: Analyzing your employer's 401(k) plan for mega backdoor Roth opportunities Implementing systematic tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts Coordinating Roth conversions and backdoor contributions Optimizing your HSA as a long-term retirement vehicle Ensuring charitable giving strategies align with your tax situation Maximizing catch-up contributions when you reach milestone ages As fiduciary advisors, we're legally obligated to act in your best interest. That means we're focused on strategies that serve your goals, not products that generate commissions. Ready to see what's possible beyond your 401(k)? Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation about your specific situation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: Does my employer's 401(k) plan automatically allow mega backdoor Roth contributions? A: No. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service conversions to Roth. Check with your HR department. Q: How do I prioritize which investment strategies to use? A: Generally, maximize employer match first (it's free money), then fully fund your 401(k), explore Mega Backdoor Roth if available, max out your HSA, consider backdoor Roth IRA contributions, and then move to taxable accounts with tax-loss harvesting. We can help determine the right sequence for your circumstances.

What's the Best Asset Allocation for Someone 10 Years Away from Retirement?

December 22, 2025
Key Takeaways Your guaranteed income sources (pensions, Social Security) matter more than your age when deciding allocation. Retiring at 65 doesn't mean your timeline ends. You likely have 20-30 years of investing ahead. Think in time buckets: near-term stability, mid-term balance, long-term growth. You're 55 years old with over a million dollars saved for retirement. Your 401(k) statements arrive each month, and you find yourself questioning whether your current allocation still makes sense. Should you be moving everything to bonds? Keeping it all in stocks? Something in between? There's no single "correct" asset allocation for everyone in this position. What works for you depends on factors unique to your situation: your retirement income sources, spending needs, and risk tolerance. Let's look at what matters most as you approach this major life transition. Why Asset Allocation Changes as Retirement Approaches When you’re 30 or 40, your investment timeline stretches decades into the future. When you’re 55 and looking to retire at 65, that equation changes because you’re no longer just building wealth: you’re preparing to start spending it. You need enough growth to keep pace with inflation and fund decades of retirement, but you also need stability to avoid the need to sell investments during market downturns. At this point, asset allocation 10 years before retirement is more nuanced than a simple “more conservative” approach. Understanding Your Actual Time Horizon Hitting retirement age doesn't make your investment timeline shrink to zero. If you retire at 65 and live to 90, that's a 25-year investment horizon. Think about your money in buckets based on when you'll need it: Time Horizon Investment Approach Example Needs Short-Term (Years 1-5 of Retirement) Stable & accessible funds Monthly living expenses, healthcare costs, and early travel plans Medium-Term (Years 6-15) Moderate risk; balanced growth Home repairs, care and income replacement, and helping grandchildren with college Long-Term (Years 16+) Growth-oriented with a Long-term care expenses, decades-long timeline legacy planning, and extended longevity needs This bucket approach helps you think beyond simple stock-versus-bond percentages. Asset Allocation 10 Years Before Retirement: Starting Points While there's no one-size-fits-all answer, here are some reasonable starting frameworks: Conservative Approach (60% stocks / 40% bonds) : Makes sense if you have minimal guaranteed income or plan to begin drawing heavily from your portfolio upon retirement. Moderate Approach (70% stocks / 30% bonds) : Works well for those with some guaranteed income sources, moderate risk tolerance, and a flexible withdrawal strategy. Growth-Oriented Approach (80% stocks / 20% bonds) : Can be appropriate if you have substantial guaranteed income covering basic expenses and the flexibility to reduce spending temporarily as needed. Remember, these are starting points for discussion, not recommendations. 3 Steps to Evaluate Your Current Allocation Ready to see if your current allocation still makes sense? Here's how to start: Step 1: Calculate your current stock/bond split. Pull your recent statements and add up everything in stocks (including mutual funds and ETFs) versus bonds. Divide each by your total portfolio to get percentages. Step 2: List your guaranteed retirement income. Write down income sources that aren't portfolio-dependent: Social Security (estimate at ssa.gov), pensions, annuities, rental income, or planned part-time work. Total the monthly amount. Step 3: Calculate your coverage gap. Estimate monthly retirement expenses, then subtract your guaranteed income. If guaranteed income covers 70-80%+ of expenses, you can be more growth-oriented. Under 50% coverage means you'll need a more balanced approach. When to Adjust Your Allocation Here are specific triggers that signal it's time to review and potentially adjust: Your allocation has drifted more than 5% from target. If you started at 70/30 stocks to bonds and market movements have pushed you to 77/23, it's time to rebalance back to your target. Your retirement timeline changes significantly. Planning to retire at 60 instead of 65? That's a trigger. Every two years of timeline shift warrants a fresh look at your allocation. Major health changes occur. A serious diagnosis that changes your life expectancy or healthcare costs should prompt an allocation review. You gain or lose a guaranteed income source. Inheriting a pension through remarriage, losing expected Social Security benefits through divorce, or discovering your pension is underfunded. Market volatility affects your sleep. If you're checking your portfolio daily and feeling genuine anxiety about normal market movements, your allocation might be too aggressive for your comfort, and that's a valid reason to adjust. Beyond Stocks and Bonds Modern retirement planning involves more than just deciding your stock-to-bond ratio. Consider international diversification (20-30% of your stock allocation), real estate exposure through REITs, cash reserves covering 1-2 years of spending, and income-producing investments such as dividend-paying stocks. The Biggest Mistake: Becoming Too Conservative Too Soon Moving everything to bonds at 55 might feel safer, but it creates two significant problems. First, you're almost guaranteeing that inflation will outpace your returns over a 30-year retirement. Second, you're missing a decade of potential growth during your peak earning and saving years. The difference between 60% and 80% stock allocation over 10 years can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars in portfolio value. Being too conservative can be just as risky as being too aggressive, just in different ways. Questions to Ask Yourself As you think about your asset allocation for the next 10 years: What percentage of my retirement spending will be covered by Social Security, pensions, or other guaranteed income? How flexible is my retirement budget? Could I reduce spending by 10-20% during a market downturn? What's my emotional reaction to seeing my portfolio drop 20% or more? Do I plan to leave money to heirs, or is my goal to spend most of it during retirement? Your honest answers to these questions matter more than your age or any generic allocation rule. Work With Professionals Who Understand Your Complete Picture At Five Pine Wealth Management, we help clients work through these decisions by looking at their complete financial picture. We stress-test different allocation strategies against various market scenarios, coordinate withdrawal strategies with tax planning, and help clients understand the trade-offs between different approaches. If you're within 10 years of retirement and wondering whether your current allocation still makes sense, let's talk. Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: What is the rule of thumb for asset allocation by age? A: Traditional rules like "subtract your age from 100" are oversimplified. Your allocation should be based on your guaranteed income sources, spending flexibility, and risk tolerance; not just your age. Q: Should I move my 401(k) to bonds before retirement? A: Not entirely. You still need growth to outpace inflation. Gradually shift toward a balanced allocation (60-80% stocks, depending on your situation) and keep 1-2 years of expenses in stable investments. Q: What's the difference between stocks and bonds in a retirement portfolio?  A: Stocks provide growth potential to keep pace with inflation but come with volatility. Bonds offer stability and income but typically don't grow as much.