Mortgage-Free Retirement: Is It Really Your Best Move?

March 7, 2025

Meet Sarah and Tom, both successful professionals in their mid-50s. Like many of our clients, they're wrestling with a common retirement planning question:


Should they pay off their mortgage before retirement?


With $200,000 left on their home loan, they love the idea of entering retirement debt-free. But they're also wondering if their money could be better used elsewhere.


This scenario plays out in countless pre-retirement conversations, and the answer isn't always straightforward. 


According to the Federal Reserve’s Survey of Consumer Finances, approximately 38% of homeowners aged 65-74 still carry mortgage debt, a significant increase from previous generations. This trend reflects changing attitudes toward retirement debt and more complex financial considerations in today’s economy. 


Why More People Are Considering Paying Off Their Mortgage Before Retirement


The decision to pay off your mortgage before retirement is deeply personal, influenced by both financial and emotional factors. Let's explore the various pros and cons of paying off a mortgage that can help guide your decision-making process.


The Pros of Paying Off Your Mortgage Before Retirement


  1. Reduced Monthly Expenses: According to the Federal Reserve, homeowners' median monthly mortgage payment was $1,500 in 2023. Reducing or eliminating this cost can significantly impact your financial freedom during retirement.
  2. Guaranteed Return on Investment: Paying off your mortgage provides a guaranteed return equal to your interest rate. If you’re paying 6% interest, eliminating that debt is like earning a risk-free 6% return which can be attractive when markets are volatile.
  3. Peace of Mind: An immeasurable sense of security comes with owning your home outright. Some clients report sleeping better at night, knowing they'll always have a roof over their heads regardless of market conditions.


Cons of Paying Off Your Mortgage Before Retirement


  1. Tying up Liquidity: A paid-off house is great, but you can’t buy groceries with bricks. If you drain off your savings to pay off your mortgage, you might find yourself “house rich, cash poor.” Emergencies could force you to dip into retirement accounts at inopportune times.
  2. Opportunity Cost: Using a large sum of money to pay off your mortgage means those funds aren't available for investment. Historically, the S&P 500 has returned an average of about 10% annually over the long term, potentially outperforming the interest saved on many mortgages.
  3. Impact on Retirement Savings: If paying off your mortgage requires withdrawing from tax-advantaged accounts like a 401(k) or IRA, you may trigger capital gains or incur higher taxes due to increased income in the withdrawal year.
  4. Inflation Benefit: Over time, inflation erodes the real value of debt. That fixed mortgage payment becomes easier to manage as your income and the cost of living rise (assuming your income adjusts accordingly). Paying it off early eliminates this potential advantage.
  5. Diversification: Keeping a mortgage while maintaining a robust investment portfolio might provide better risk management through diversification.


Emotional Considerations


For many, the decision is as emotional as it is financial. Some retirees sleep better knowing they own their home outright. Others find comfort in having a robust investment portfolio and a manageable mortgage.


Owning a home outright often provides a deep sense of security. It represents stability, independence, and the comfort of knowing you have a place to live without the worry of monthly payments. This emotional relief can significantly reduce stress, especially during market downturns or economic uncertainty. The idea of having a fully paid-off home can also foster a sense of accomplishment—a tangible reward for years of hard work and financial discipline.


On the other hand, maintaining a mortgage while having substantial liquid assets can provide a different kind of emotional security. Knowing you have cash readily available to cover emergencies, opportunities, or unexpected expenses can create a strong sense of financial freedom. It allows for flexibility in decision-making without the pressure of having all your wealth tied up in a single asset.


Ultimately, the emotional factor is deeply personal. It’s about identifying what gives you peace of mind whether that's seeing a zero balance on your mortgage statement or knowing you have a healthy, diversified investment portfolio that offers both growth potential and accessibility.


Key Questions to Ask Yourself


  • What is my current cash flow? Can I comfortably afford my monthly payments alongside other expenses?
  • Do I have enough liquid savings for emergencies? Aim for at least 6-12 months’ worth of expenses.
  • How will paying off my mortgage impact my taxes? Consult with a financial adviser to understand potential changes.
  • Does debt cause me stress? If the emotional burden outweighs potential financial gains, paying it off could be the right move.
  • What’s my retirement income plan? Will eliminating your mortgage reduce the need for withdrawals from tax-advantaged accounts?


A Balanced Approach: Partial Payoff


The right choice often lies in finding a middle ground. Consider a middle-ground approach if you're torn between paying off your mortgage completely or keeping it into retirement. You might want to consider one of these options:


  • Make extra mortgage payments to reduce the principal but maintain investment contributions.
  • Pay off a portion of the mortgage to lower monthly payments while keeping some assets liquid.
  • Refinance to a shorter term if rates are favorable to accelerate payoff while maintaining investments.


Let's return to Sarah and Tom's story. After carefully weighing their options, they chose a hybrid approach. They decided to use a portion of their savings to pay down half of their mortgage principal, reducing their monthly payments significantly. This approach allowed them to maintain a healthy investment portfolio while decreasing their monthly expenses in retirement.


The decision gave them the best of both worlds—they kept their investment strategy intact while gaining more monthly flexibility and peace of mind. Today, they're confidently moving forward with their retirement plans, knowing they've struck the right balance for their unique situation.


Everyone’s situation is different, but Sarah and Tom's story shows you can find the right balance between financial security and optimization of your resources to create an ideal solution for your retirement journey.


Making Your Decision: Should You Pay Off Your Mortgage Before Retirement?


The bottom line is there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. What works for one person might not be the best choice for another. It depends on your financial picture, risk tolerance, and emotional comfort. 


If you're wrestling with this decision, we're here to help you look at the comprehensive picture. At Five Pine Wealth Management, we can help you evaluate how paying off your mortgage before retirement fits into your broader investment strategy.


Would your retirement feel more carefree with a paid-off home? Or would the funds be better off in a low-cost, diversified investment? 


Together, we can analyze both the emotional aspects and the financial impacts of this decision. Let’s sit down, run the numbers, and find the best path for you. Call 877-333-1015 or email us at info@fivepinewealth.com to schedule a meeting today!


Your retirement peace of mind is our priority. Let's work together to ensure your mortgage strategy supports the retirement lifestyle you've worked so hard to achieve.

Join Our Newsletter


Plan smarter with our monthly financial tips + insights

January 26, 2026
Key Takeaways High earners maxing out 401(k)s at $24,500 are only saving about 8% of a $300,000 income in their primary retirement account. The mega backdoor Roth strategy can increase total 401(k) contributions to $72,000 annually with tax-free growth. A comprehensive approach can create nearly $3 million in additional retirement wealth over 20 years. It's 2026. You're checking all the boxes. You're earning upwards of $300,000 annually, and you're maxing out your 401(k) every year. You've reached the $24,500 contribution limit and feel confident about securing your financial future. Then you realize $24,500 represents less than 8% of your income. Over 20 years, this gap adds up to millions in lost opportunity. Thankfully, you're not stuck with the basic 401(k) playbook. There are sophisticated strategies beyond your contribution limit. 5 Strategic Moves for High Earners with Maxed-Out 401(k)s Here are five sophisticated strategies that can help you build wealth beyond your basic 401(k) contributions. All projections assume a 7% average annual return and are estimates for illustrative purposes. 1. Mega Backdoor Roth Contributions If your employer's 401(k) plan allows after-tax contributions, this could be your biggest opportunity. With employee contributions, employer match, and after-tax contributions, the combined 401(k) limit for 2026 is $72,000 ($80,000 if you're 50 or older). The mega backdoor Roth works because you immediately convert those after-tax contributions into a Roth account, where they grow tax-free forever. The catch: Not all employers offer this option. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service Roth conversions. The impact: The available space for after-tax contributions depends on your employer match. With a typical employer match of 3-6% (roughly $10,000-$21,000 on a $350,000 salary), you could contribute approximately $26,500-$37,000 annually. At 7% average returns over 20 years, this creates approximately $1.1-$1.5 million in additional tax-free retirement savings. 2. Donor-Advised Funds for Charitable Giving If you're charitably inclined, donor-advised funds (DAFs) offer a way to bunch several years of charitable contributions into one tax year, maximizing your itemized deductions while still spreading your giving over time. You get an immediate tax deduction for the full contribution, but you can recommend grants to charities over many years. The funds grow tax-free in the meantime. The catch: Once you contribute to a DAF, the money is irrevocably committed to charity. You can't get it back for personal use. The impact: Contributing $50,000 to a DAF in a high-income year (versus giving $10,000 annually) can create immediate federal tax savings of $15,000-$18,500 while still allowing you to support the same charities over five years. 3. Taxable Brokerage Accounts with Tax-Loss Harvesting Once you've maximized tax-advantaged accounts, strategic taxable investing becomes your next move. The key is working with a financial advisor who implements systematic tax-loss harvesting throughout the year. Tax-loss harvesting involves selling investments at a loss to offset capital gains elsewhere. Done strategically, this can save thousands in taxes annually. The catch: Long-term capital gain rates (0%, 15%, or 20%) are lower than ordinary income tax rates, but you're still paying taxes on gains. It's less tax-efficient than retirement accounts, but far better than ignoring tax optimization. The impact: For high earners in the 35-37% ordinary income brackets, the difference between long-term capital gains (20%) and ordinary rates is significant. Effective tax-loss harvesting on $50,000 in annual gains over 20 years could save $150,000+ in taxes. 4. Health Savings Account (HSA) Triple Tax Advantage HSAs offer a unique triple tax benefit: tax-deductible contributions, tax-free growth, and tax-free withdrawals for qualified medical expenses. With 2026 contribution limits of $4,400 for individuals and $8,750 for families, this adds another powerful layer to your strategy. You can invest HSA funds just like an IRA and let them grow for decades. After age 65, you can withdraw the funds for any purpose, medical or otherwise. The catch: You must have a high-deductible health plan to qualify for an HSA. After age 65, non-medical withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income (like traditional IRA distributions), but you still benefit from the upfront deduction and decades of tax-free growth. The impact: Contributing the family maximum ($8,750) annually for 20 years at a 7% average annual return creates approximately $355,000-$360,000 in tax-advantaged savings. 5. Backdoor Roth IRA Contributions Not to be confused with mega backdoor Roth contributions! Even if your income exceeds the Roth IRA contribution limits, you can still fund a Roth through the backdoor method: make a non-deductible contribution to a traditional IRA, then immediately convert it to a Roth IRA. The catch: If you have existing traditional IRA balances, the pro-rata rule complicates things. You may want to consider rolling those funds into your 401(k) first if your plan allows. The impact: Contributing $7,000 annually through the backdoor Roth for 20 years at 7% average annual return creates approximately $285,000-$290,000 in tax-free retirement savings. What Compounding These Strategies Looks Like Over 20 Years Let’s look at approximate outcomes based on a 7% average annual return. 401(k) Only: Annual contribution: $24,500 Total after 20 years: ~$1M 401(k) + Mega Backdoor Roth: Annual contribution: $72,000 Total after 20 years: ~$3M Note: Mega backdoor Roth space varies based on your employer's match. These calculations assume you're maximizing the total annual limit. Comprehensive Approach (under age 50): Mega Backdoor Roth: ~$3.0M HSA: ~$350K-$360K Backdoor Roth IRA: ~$285K-$290K Strategic taxable investing with tax-loss harvesting Total retirement savings: ~$3.6M+, plus taxable investments Comprehensive Approach (ages 50-59): With higher contribution limits and catch-up contributions, total retirement savings can reach ~$4M+ over 20 years. Comprehensive Approach (ages 60–63 with enhanced catch-up contributions) Higher contribution limits during peak earning years allow for meaningful acceleration of retirement savings. The exact impact depends on timing, contribution duration, and existing balances. The Bottom Line The difference between stopping at your basic 401(k) and implementing a comprehensive strategy can approach $3 million or more in additional retirement wealth over time. Why Strategic Coordination Matters These aren't either/or decisions. The most effective approach coordinates multiple strategies while ensuring everything works together. At Five Pine Wealth Management , we help high-earning clients build comprehensive plans that go beyond the 401(k). We coordinate your employer benefits, tax strategies, and investment accounts to create a cohesive approach that maximizes your wealth-building potential. This requires working across several areas: Analyzing your employer's 401(k) plan for mega backdoor Roth opportunities Implementing systematic tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts Coordinating Roth conversions and backdoor contributions Optimizing your HSA as a long-term retirement vehicle Ensuring charitable giving strategies align with your tax situation Maximizing catch-up contributions when you reach milestone ages As fiduciary advisors, we're legally obligated to act in your best interest. That means we're focused on strategies that serve your goals, not products that generate commissions. Ready to see what's possible beyond your 401(k)? Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation about your specific situation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: Does my employer's 401(k) plan automatically allow mega backdoor Roth contributions? A: No. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service conversions to Roth. Check with your HR department. Q: How do I prioritize which investment strategies to use? A: Generally, maximize employer match first (it's free money), then fully fund your 401(k), explore Mega Backdoor Roth if available, max out your HSA, consider backdoor Roth IRA contributions, and then move to taxable accounts with tax-loss harvesting. We can help determine the right sequence for your circumstances.
December 22, 2025
Key Takeaways Your guaranteed income sources (pensions, Social Security) matter more than your age when deciding allocation. Retiring at 65 doesn't mean your timeline ends. You likely have 20-30 years of investing ahead. Think in time buckets: near-term stability, mid-term balance, long-term growth. You're 55 years old with over a million dollars saved for retirement. Your 401(k) statements arrive each month, and you find yourself questioning whether your current allocation still makes sense. Should you be moving everything to bonds? Keeping it all in stocks? Something in between? There's no single "correct" asset allocation for everyone in this position. What works for you depends on factors unique to your situation: your retirement income sources, spending needs, and risk tolerance. Let's look at what matters most as you approach this major life transition. Why Asset Allocation Changes as Retirement Approaches When you’re 30 or 40, your investment timeline stretches decades into the future. When you’re 55 and looking to retire at 65, that equation changes because you’re no longer just building wealth: you’re preparing to start spending it. You need enough growth to keep pace with inflation and fund decades of retirement, but you also need stability to avoid the need to sell investments during market downturns. At this point, asset allocation 10 years before retirement is more nuanced than a simple “more conservative” approach. Understanding Your Actual Time Horizon Hitting retirement age doesn't make your investment timeline shrink to zero. If you retire at 65 and live to 90, that's a 25-year investment horizon. Think about your money in buckets based on when you'll need it: Time Horizon Investment Approach Example Needs Short-Term (Years 1-5 of Retirement) Stable & accessible funds Monthly living expenses, healthcare costs, and early travel plans Medium-Term (Years 6-15) Moderate risk; balanced growth Home repairs, care and income replacement, and helping grandchildren with college Long-Term (Years 16+) Growth-oriented with a Long-term care expenses, decades-long timeline legacy planning, and extended longevity needs This bucket approach helps you think beyond simple stock-versus-bond percentages. Asset Allocation 10 Years Before Retirement: Starting Points While there's no one-size-fits-all answer, here are some reasonable starting frameworks: Conservative Approach (60% stocks / 40% bonds) : Makes sense if you have minimal guaranteed income or plan to begin drawing heavily from your portfolio upon retirement. Moderate Approach (70% stocks / 30% bonds) : Works well for those with some guaranteed income sources, moderate risk tolerance, and a flexible withdrawal strategy. Growth-Oriented Approach (80% stocks / 20% bonds) : Can be appropriate if you have substantial guaranteed income covering basic expenses and the flexibility to reduce spending temporarily as needed. Remember, these are starting points for discussion, not recommendations. 3 Steps to Evaluate Your Current Allocation Ready to see if your current allocation still makes sense? Here's how to start: Step 1: Calculate your current stock/bond split. Pull your recent statements and add up everything in stocks (including mutual funds and ETFs) versus bonds. Divide each by your total portfolio to get percentages. Step 2: List your guaranteed retirement income. Write down income sources that aren't portfolio-dependent: Social Security (estimate at ssa.gov), pensions, annuities, rental income, or planned part-time work. Total the monthly amount. Step 3: Calculate your coverage gap. Estimate monthly retirement expenses, then subtract your guaranteed income. If guaranteed income covers 70-80%+ of expenses, you can be more growth-oriented. Under 50% coverage means you'll need a more balanced approach. When to Adjust Your Allocation Here are specific triggers that signal it's time to review and potentially adjust: Your allocation has drifted more than 5% from target. If you started at 70/30 stocks to bonds and market movements have pushed you to 77/23, it's time to rebalance back to your target. Your retirement timeline changes significantly. Planning to retire at 60 instead of 65? That's a trigger. Every two years of timeline shift warrants a fresh look at your allocation. Major health changes occur. A serious diagnosis that changes your life expectancy or healthcare costs should prompt an allocation review. You gain or lose a guaranteed income source. Inheriting a pension through remarriage, losing expected Social Security benefits through divorce, or discovering your pension is underfunded. Market volatility affects your sleep. If you're checking your portfolio daily and feeling genuine anxiety about normal market movements, your allocation might be too aggressive for your comfort, and that's a valid reason to adjust. Beyond Stocks and Bonds Modern retirement planning involves more than just deciding your stock-to-bond ratio. Consider international diversification (20-30% of your stock allocation), real estate exposure through REITs, cash reserves covering 1-2 years of spending, and income-producing investments such as dividend-paying stocks. The Biggest Mistake: Becoming Too Conservative Too Soon Moving everything to bonds at 55 might feel safer, but it creates two significant problems. First, you're almost guaranteeing that inflation will outpace your returns over a 30-year retirement. Second, you're missing a decade of potential growth during your peak earning and saving years. The difference between 60% and 80% stock allocation over 10 years can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars in portfolio value. Being too conservative can be just as risky as being too aggressive, just in different ways. Questions to Ask Yourself As you think about your asset allocation for the next 10 years: What percentage of my retirement spending will be covered by Social Security, pensions, or other guaranteed income? How flexible is my retirement budget? Could I reduce spending by 10-20% during a market downturn? What's my emotional reaction to seeing my portfolio drop 20% or more? Do I plan to leave money to heirs, or is my goal to spend most of it during retirement? Your honest answers to these questions matter more than your age or any generic allocation rule. Work With Professionals Who Understand Your Complete Picture At Five Pine Wealth Management, we help clients work through these decisions by looking at their complete financial picture. We stress-test different allocation strategies against various market scenarios, coordinate withdrawal strategies with tax planning, and help clients understand the trade-offs between different approaches. If you're within 10 years of retirement and wondering whether your current allocation still makes sense, let's talk. Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: What is the rule of thumb for asset allocation by age? A: Traditional rules like "subtract your age from 100" are oversimplified. Your allocation should be based on your guaranteed income sources, spending flexibility, and risk tolerance; not just your age. Q: Should I move my 401(k) to bonds before retirement? A: Not entirely. You still need growth to outpace inflation. Gradually shift toward a balanced allocation (60-80% stocks, depending on your situation) and keep 1-2 years of expenses in stable investments. Q: What's the difference between stocks and bonds in a retirement portfolio?  A: Stocks provide growth potential to keep pace with inflation but come with volatility. Bonds offer stability and income but typically don't grow as much.