Finding the Right Financial Fit: How Do Couples Split Finances?

Admin • April 19, 2024

Being in a devoted relationship means blending your lives in more ways than one, not just emotionally, but also navigating complex processes such as combining your finances. How do you and your partner want to manage money together? There’s no one-size-fits-all solution, but most modern couples settle on one of a few common approaches to sharing or combining finances.

Deciding how to handle money as a couple is a personal decision without any objectively “right” answer. It depends on your values, goals, circumstances, and what works best for your situation. The most important things are to communicate openly and honestly about it, get on the same page, and revisit the topic regularly as your life evolves.

How Do Couples Split Finances?

If you’re wondering how to manage money as a couple, check out five common ways modern couples are structuring their finances:

1. Merging Finances Completely 

Some couples go all-in and completely combine their finances into one joint pot. They share bank accounts, investments, assets, and debts equally. All income goes into the joint accounts, and all expenses are paid out of the joint accounts. There is no delineation of “my money” and “your money” — it is 100% “our money.”

This is the most traditional approach couples take to their finances. A 2022 study by Creditcards.com found that 43% of couples who are married or living together combine their money. 

The combined approach promotes full financial partnership and can simplify money management. However, it does require a very high level of mutual trust, communication, and alignment on financial values and goals. It may be an easier transition for married couples.

2. Keeping Finances Separate 

At the other end of the spectrum, some couples keep their finances separate throughout the relationship. They maintain individual bank accounts, investment accounts, etc., and have no jointly owned accounts or assets. Income and expenses are accounted for individually. The same Creditcards.com poll found that 23% of couples have completely separate accounts.

Keeping finances totally separate allows each partner to maintain their full financial autonomy and avoids the intermingling of assets. It can work well for couples with complex financial situations or very different spending habits/philosophies. However, it may not allow for easy sharing of expenses, saving towards joint goals, or a true partnership mindset around money.

3. Combining Some Finances and Keeping Others Separate 

Most couples (57%) land somewhere in the middle and partially combine their finances. Common setups include:

  • Maintaining separate personal checking/saving accounts but also a joint account for household expenses
  • Keeping investment/retirement accounts separate but sharing a joint checking account
  • Paying specific bills jointly and other bills individually

This hybrid model provides the benefits of both combined and separate finances. It allows for shared financial responsibility in certain areas while maintaining some individual financial autonomy in others. The challenge is agreeing on what accounts/expenses should be joint vs. individual.

4. Proportional Splitting Based on Income 

When combining finances jointly, some couples split shared expenses proportionally based on their individual incomes rather than an equal 50/50 split. If one partner earns significantly more income, they may pay a larger percentage of joint expenses while the lower-earning partner pays a smaller percentage.

This approach aims to balance financial burden fairly based on means. However, it requires detailed tracking of expenses and can create a dynamic of one partner paying for more (or being financially dependent). Some couples adjust the proportions if partners have a significant income disparity.

5. Living Off One Income and Saving/Investing the Other 

Another approach for couples with two incomes is having one partner’s income pay for all living expenses while the other partner’s income is saved/invested in full. This potentially allows couples to supercharge savings and wealth-building.

However, this method requires that one income truly cover 100% of expenses. It may foster imbalance if one partner controls all spending while the other is relegated to no discretionary spending. Couples who merge incomes this way often revisit and adjust the arrangement over time.

How Should Unmarried Couples Share Finances?

Unmarried couples face a unique set of considerations regarding money matters. Here are some key tips to navigate shared finances without the legal protections of marriage:

  1. Open Communication is King (and Queen): This goes double for unmarried couples. Discuss financial goals, debt, spending habits, and what “fairness” means to each of you.
  2. Consider a Cohabitation Agreement: This legal document outlines how you’ll handle shared assets and debts if you break up. It might not be the most romantic conversation, but it protects both of you financially.
  3. Think “Shared Expenses,” Not “Joint Everything”: Maybe a joint account works for bills and groceries, while separate accounts handle personal spending. This allows for teamwork on shared goals while maintaining some financial independence.
  4. The Percentage Play Can Be Your Ally: If one partner earns significantly more, contributing a percentage of income to a joint account can ensure fairness — for instance, 60%/40% based on earnings.
  5. Have an Exit Strategy: As unpleasant as it is, discuss a backup plan for separating your finances cleanly if you break up down the road.
  6. Estate Planning for Unforeseen Circumstances: Without marriage protections, unmarried partners aren’t automatically entitled to inherit assets or make medical decisions for each other. Consider wills, power of attorney documents, and beneficiary designations for retirement accounts and life insurance.
  7. Seek Professional Guidance: A financial advisor can help you develop a personalized plan that considers your income disparity, financial goals, and risk tolerance.

Communication is Key: 5 Tips for Managing Money as a Couple

Ultimately, every relationship is unique, and there is no universal “best” approach to how modern couples share or merge finances. Open communication and finding the right balance for your situation is critical. Many couples also evolve their financial arrangements over time as life circumstances change.

  1. Set Regular Money Dates: Schedule dedicated times to discuss finances, review budgets, and set goals together.
  2. Be Transparent: Share your financial history, including debts, assets, and spending habits , to build trust and avoid surprises.
  3. Define Roles and Responsibilities: Clearly outline each partner’s financial responsibilities, from bill payments to long-term investments.
  4. Compromise: Understand that financial priorities may differ, and be willing to compromise to find common ground.
  5. Seek Professional Guidance: Consult a financial advisor or counselor to help navigate complex financial matters and provide objective advice.

The most important things are to find common ground with your partner, trust each other, align your financial goals, avoid keeping money secrets, and revisit your system regularly. Money is one of the most common sources of relationship strife — but it doesn’t have to be when couples work as a team. How you manage money together is up to you as a couple.

Seeking Expert Guidance? Five Pine Wealth is Here to Help!

Managing finances as a couple can be a breeze with the right tools and strategies. At Five Pine Wealth Management , our team is here to help you develop a personalized plan that caters to your unique financial goals and relationship dynamic. 

Do you need help deciding how to manage your finances together? Email or give us a call at 877.333.1015 to schedule a meeting. Let’s craft the best plan for managing your money as a couple!

Join Our Newsletter


Plan smarter with our monthly financial tips + insights

You've Maxed Your 401(k). Now What? A Strategic Guide for High Earners

January 26, 2026
Key Takeaways High earners maxing out 401(k)s at $24,500 are only saving about 8% of a $300,000 income in their primary retirement account. The mega backdoor Roth strategy can increase total 401(k) contributions to $72,000 annually with tax-free growth. A comprehensive approach can create nearly $3 million in additional retirement wealth over 20 years. It's 2026. You're checking all the boxes. You're earning upwards of $300,000 annually, and you're maxing out your 401(k) every year. You've reached the $24,500 contribution limit and feel confident about securing your financial future. Then you realize $24,500 represents less than 8% of your income. Over 20 years, this gap adds up to millions in lost opportunity. Thankfully, you're not stuck with the basic 401(k) playbook. There are sophisticated strategies beyond your contribution limit. 5 Strategic Moves for High Earners with Maxed-Out 401(k)s Here are five sophisticated strategies that can help you build wealth beyond your basic 401(k) contributions. All projections assume a 7% average annual return and are estimates for illustrative purposes. 1. Mega Backdoor Roth Contributions If your employer's 401(k) plan allows after-tax contributions, this could be your biggest opportunity. With employee contributions, employer match, and after-tax contributions, the combined 401(k) limit for 2026 is $72,000 ($80,000 if you're 50 or older). The mega backdoor Roth works because you immediately convert those after-tax contributions into a Roth account, where they grow tax-free forever. The catch: Not all employers offer this option. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service Roth conversions. The impact: The available space for after-tax contributions depends on your employer match. With a typical employer match of 3-6% (roughly $10,000-$21,000 on a $350,000 salary), you could contribute approximately $26,500-$37,000 annually. At 7% average returns over 20 years, this creates approximately $1.1-$1.5 million in additional tax-free retirement savings. 2. Donor-Advised Funds for Charitable Giving If you're charitably inclined, donor-advised funds (DAFs) offer a way to bunch several years of charitable contributions into one tax year, maximizing your itemized deductions while still spreading your giving over time. You get an immediate tax deduction for the full contribution, but you can recommend grants to charities over many years. The funds grow tax-free in the meantime. The catch: Once you contribute to a DAF, the money is irrevocably committed to charity. You can't get it back for personal use. The impact: Contributing $50,000 to a DAF in a high-income year (versus giving $10,000 annually) can create immediate federal tax savings of $15,000-$18,500 while still allowing you to support the same charities over five years. 3. Taxable Brokerage Accounts with Tax-Loss Harvesting Once you've maximized tax-advantaged accounts, strategic taxable investing becomes your next move. The key is working with a financial advisor who implements systematic tax-loss harvesting throughout the year. Tax-loss harvesting involves selling investments at a loss to offset capital gains elsewhere. Done strategically, this can save thousands in taxes annually. The catch: Long-term capital gain rates (0%, 15%, or 20%) are lower than ordinary income tax rates, but you're still paying taxes on gains. It's less tax-efficient than retirement accounts, but far better than ignoring tax optimization. The impact: For high earners in the 35-37% ordinary income brackets, the difference between long-term capital gains (20%) and ordinary rates is significant. Effective tax-loss harvesting on $50,000 in annual gains over 20 years could save $150,000+ in taxes. 4. Health Savings Account (HSA) Triple Tax Advantage HSAs offer a unique triple tax benefit: tax-deductible contributions, tax-free growth, and tax-free withdrawals for qualified medical expenses. With 2026 contribution limits of $4,400 for individuals and $8,750 for families, this adds another powerful layer to your strategy. You can invest HSA funds just like an IRA and let them grow for decades. After age 65, you can withdraw the funds for any purpose, medical or otherwise. The catch: You must have a high-deductible health plan to qualify for an HSA. After age 65, non-medical withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income (like traditional IRA distributions), but you still benefit from the upfront deduction and decades of tax-free growth. The impact: Contributing the family maximum ($8,750) annually for 20 years at a 7% average annual return creates approximately $355,000-$360,000 in tax-advantaged savings. 5. Backdoor Roth IRA Contributions Not to be confused with mega backdoor Roth contributions! Even if your income exceeds the Roth IRA contribution limits, you can still fund a Roth through the backdoor method: make a non-deductible contribution to a traditional IRA, then immediately convert it to a Roth IRA. The catch: If you have existing traditional IRA balances, the pro-rata rule complicates things. You may want to consider rolling those funds into your 401(k) first if your plan allows. The impact: Contributing $7,000 annually through the backdoor Roth for 20 years at 7% average annual return creates approximately $285,000-$290,000 in tax-free retirement savings. What Compounding These Strategies Looks Like Over 20 Years Let’s look at approximate outcomes based on a 7% average annual return. 401(k) Only: Annual contribution: $24,500 Total after 20 years: ~$1M 401(k) + Mega Backdoor Roth: Annual contribution: $72,000 Total after 20 years: ~$3M Note: Mega backdoor Roth space varies based on your employer's match. These calculations assume you're maximizing the total annual limit. Comprehensive Approach (under age 50): Mega Backdoor Roth: ~$3.0M HSA: ~$350K-$360K Backdoor Roth IRA: ~$285K-$290K Strategic taxable investing with tax-loss harvesting Total retirement savings: ~$3.6M+, plus taxable investments Comprehensive Approach (ages 50-59): With higher contribution limits and catch-up contributions, total retirement savings can reach ~$4M+ over 20 years. Comprehensive Approach (ages 60–63 with enhanced catch-up contributions) Higher contribution limits during peak earning years allow for meaningful acceleration of retirement savings. The exact impact depends on timing, contribution duration, and existing balances. The Bottom Line The difference between stopping at your basic 401(k) and implementing a comprehensive strategy can approach $3 million or more in additional retirement wealth over time. Why Strategic Coordination Matters These aren't either/or decisions. The most effective approach coordinates multiple strategies while ensuring everything works together. At Five Pine Wealth Management , we help high-earning clients build comprehensive plans that go beyond the 401(k). We coordinate your employer benefits, tax strategies, and investment accounts to create a cohesive approach that maximizes your wealth-building potential. This requires working across several areas: Analyzing your employer's 401(k) plan for mega backdoor Roth opportunities Implementing systematic tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts Coordinating Roth conversions and backdoor contributions Optimizing your HSA as a long-term retirement vehicle Ensuring charitable giving strategies align with your tax situation Maximizing catch-up contributions when you reach milestone ages As fiduciary advisors, we're legally obligated to act in your best interest. That means we're focused on strategies that serve your goals, not products that generate commissions. Ready to see what's possible beyond your 401(k)? Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation about your specific situation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: Does my employer's 401(k) plan automatically allow mega backdoor Roth contributions? A: No. You need a plan that permits after-tax contributions and in-service conversions to Roth. Check with your HR department. Q: How do I prioritize which investment strategies to use? A: Generally, maximize employer match first (it's free money), then fully fund your 401(k), explore Mega Backdoor Roth if available, max out your HSA, consider backdoor Roth IRA contributions, and then move to taxable accounts with tax-loss harvesting. We can help determine the right sequence for your circumstances.

What's the Best Asset Allocation for Someone 10 Years Away from Retirement?

December 22, 2025
Key Takeaways Your guaranteed income sources (pensions, Social Security) matter more than your age when deciding allocation. Retiring at 65 doesn't mean your timeline ends. You likely have 20-30 years of investing ahead. Think in time buckets: near-term stability, mid-term balance, long-term growth. You're 55 years old with over a million dollars saved for retirement. Your 401(k) statements arrive each month, and you find yourself questioning whether your current allocation still makes sense. Should you be moving everything to bonds? Keeping it all in stocks? Something in between? There's no single "correct" asset allocation for everyone in this position. What works for you depends on factors unique to your situation: your retirement income sources, spending needs, and risk tolerance. Let's look at what matters most as you approach this major life transition. Why Asset Allocation Changes as Retirement Approaches When you’re 30 or 40, your investment timeline stretches decades into the future. When you’re 55 and looking to retire at 65, that equation changes because you’re no longer just building wealth: you’re preparing to start spending it. You need enough growth to keep pace with inflation and fund decades of retirement, but you also need stability to avoid the need to sell investments during market downturns. At this point, asset allocation 10 years before retirement is more nuanced than a simple “more conservative” approach. Understanding Your Actual Time Horizon Hitting retirement age doesn't make your investment timeline shrink to zero. If you retire at 65 and live to 90, that's a 25-year investment horizon. Think about your money in buckets based on when you'll need it: Time Horizon Investment Approach Example Needs Short-Term (Years 1-5 of Retirement) Stable & accessible funds Monthly living expenses, healthcare costs, and early travel plans Medium-Term (Years 6-15) Moderate risk; balanced growth Home repairs, care and income replacement, and helping grandchildren with college Long-Term (Years 16+) Growth-oriented with a Long-term care expenses, decades-long timeline legacy planning, and extended longevity needs This bucket approach helps you think beyond simple stock-versus-bond percentages. Asset Allocation 10 Years Before Retirement: Starting Points While there's no one-size-fits-all answer, here are some reasonable starting frameworks: Conservative Approach (60% stocks / 40% bonds) : Makes sense if you have minimal guaranteed income or plan to begin drawing heavily from your portfolio upon retirement. Moderate Approach (70% stocks / 30% bonds) : Works well for those with some guaranteed income sources, moderate risk tolerance, and a flexible withdrawal strategy. Growth-Oriented Approach (80% stocks / 20% bonds) : Can be appropriate if you have substantial guaranteed income covering basic expenses and the flexibility to reduce spending temporarily as needed. Remember, these are starting points for discussion, not recommendations. 3 Steps to Evaluate Your Current Allocation Ready to see if your current allocation still makes sense? Here's how to start: Step 1: Calculate your current stock/bond split. Pull your recent statements and add up everything in stocks (including mutual funds and ETFs) versus bonds. Divide each by your total portfolio to get percentages. Step 2: List your guaranteed retirement income. Write down income sources that aren't portfolio-dependent: Social Security (estimate at ssa.gov), pensions, annuities, rental income, or planned part-time work. Total the monthly amount. Step 3: Calculate your coverage gap. Estimate monthly retirement expenses, then subtract your guaranteed income. If guaranteed income covers 70-80%+ of expenses, you can be more growth-oriented. Under 50% coverage means you'll need a more balanced approach. When to Adjust Your Allocation Here are specific triggers that signal it's time to review and potentially adjust: Your allocation has drifted more than 5% from target. If you started at 70/30 stocks to bonds and market movements have pushed you to 77/23, it's time to rebalance back to your target. Your retirement timeline changes significantly. Planning to retire at 60 instead of 65? That's a trigger. Every two years of timeline shift warrants a fresh look at your allocation. Major health changes occur. A serious diagnosis that changes your life expectancy or healthcare costs should prompt an allocation review. You gain or lose a guaranteed income source. Inheriting a pension through remarriage, losing expected Social Security benefits through divorce, or discovering your pension is underfunded. Market volatility affects your sleep. If you're checking your portfolio daily and feeling genuine anxiety about normal market movements, your allocation might be too aggressive for your comfort, and that's a valid reason to adjust. Beyond Stocks and Bonds Modern retirement planning involves more than just deciding your stock-to-bond ratio. Consider international diversification (20-30% of your stock allocation), real estate exposure through REITs, cash reserves covering 1-2 years of spending, and income-producing investments such as dividend-paying stocks. The Biggest Mistake: Becoming Too Conservative Too Soon Moving everything to bonds at 55 might feel safer, but it creates two significant problems. First, you're almost guaranteeing that inflation will outpace your returns over a 30-year retirement. Second, you're missing a decade of potential growth during your peak earning and saving years. The difference between 60% and 80% stock allocation over 10 years can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars in portfolio value. Being too conservative can be just as risky as being too aggressive, just in different ways. Questions to Ask Yourself As you think about your asset allocation for the next 10 years: What percentage of my retirement spending will be covered by Social Security, pensions, or other guaranteed income? How flexible is my retirement budget? Could I reduce spending by 10-20% during a market downturn? What's my emotional reaction to seeing my portfolio drop 20% or more? Do I plan to leave money to heirs, or is my goal to spend most of it during retirement? Your honest answers to these questions matter more than your age or any generic allocation rule. Work With Professionals Who Understand Your Complete Picture At Five Pine Wealth Management, we help clients work through these decisions by looking at their complete financial picture. We stress-test different allocation strategies against various market scenarios, coordinate withdrawal strategies with tax planning, and help clients understand the trade-offs between different approaches. If you're within 10 years of retirement and wondering whether your current allocation still makes sense, let's talk. Email us at info@fivepinewealth.com or call 877.333.1015 to schedule a conversation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q: What is the rule of thumb for asset allocation by age? A: Traditional rules like "subtract your age from 100" are oversimplified. Your allocation should be based on your guaranteed income sources, spending flexibility, and risk tolerance; not just your age. Q: Should I move my 401(k) to bonds before retirement? A: Not entirely. You still need growth to outpace inflation. Gradually shift toward a balanced allocation (60-80% stocks, depending on your situation) and keep 1-2 years of expenses in stable investments. Q: What's the difference between stocks and bonds in a retirement portfolio?  A: Stocks provide growth potential to keep pace with inflation but come with volatility. Bonds offer stability and income but typically don't grow as much.